Appeal Court delivers judgment in Metuh’s case Wednesday
The Court of Appeal in Abuja will Wednesday deliver judgments in the
appeal by spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh.
The Nation learnt Tuesday that parties in the case have been issued hearing notices to that effect.
A three-man panel, head by Justice Abdul Aboki had on May 5 told parties that they would be informed of the date for judgment.
Metuh and his company, Destra Investment Limited are appealing the
ruling by Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court, Abuja.
Justice Abang had, in the ruling, refused their no-case submission
and ordered them to enter defence in their trial for money laundering
and unlawful receipt of funds from the Office of the National Security
Adviser (ONSA).
Metuh and his company are being tried on a seven-count charge. At the
completion of the prosecution’s case earlier this year, having called
eight witnesses, the court called on the defence to open its case.
Rather than conducting their defence, Metuh and Destra elected to
make a no-case submission, which Justice Abang rejects in a ruling.
Justice Abang was of the view that the prosecution has provided
sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the
defendants to warrant the court to call on them to enter defence.
Metuh’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) and lawyer to his company,
Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN), had while adopting their briefs on May 5,
faulted Justice Abang’s reasoning in rejecting their clients’ no-case
submissions.
They urged the court to set aside Justice Abang’s decision, uphold
their clients’ no-case submission and quash the charges against them.
Responding, prosecution lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir urged the court to
dismiss the Appeal for lacking in merit and for being defective.
Tahir noted that the appeal being an interlocutory one, the
appellants were required under the law, to first obtain the leave of the
trial court.
He argued that, having not fulfilled the condition precedent, the
appellants could not claim to have a valid appeal before the court.
Post a Comment