CBN to introduce flexible exchange rate policy soon
As the battle for fate of the country’s foreign exchange regime
rages, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) has directed the Central Bank
of Nigeria (CBN) to adopt a flexible exchange rate policy.
The reason for adopting a flexible exchange rate policy the MPC
argued is to restore the automatic adjustments properties of the
exchange rate.
Addressing journalists at the end of the bi-monthly MPC meeting in
Abuja Tuesday, the CBN Governor Mr Godwin Emefiele disclosed that the
“foreign exchange market framework, now
ready, the MPC voted unanimously to adopt greater flexibility
in exchange rate policy to restore the automatic adjustment properties
of the exchange rate. Consequently, all 9 members voted to hold and
introduce greater flexibility in managing the foreign exchange rate.”
The MPC in its assessment of the relevant risk profiles, Emefiele
said “came to the conclusion that although, the balance of
risks remains tilted against growth; previous decisions need time to
crystalize. Consequently, in a period of stagflation, the policy options
are very limited. To avoid complicating the conditions, the Committee
decided on the least risky option to hold.”
The least risky option he said was the adoption of a flexible foreign
exchange rate. However, the CBN pointed out “would retain a small
window for funding critical transactions. Details of operation of the
market would be released by the CBN in a few days time the CBN Givernor
revealed.
“Critical transactions” according to the CBN Governor include foreign
and local investments in manufacturing and importation of equipment
purely for basic raw materials with very low altitude cal content.
Commenting on the state of the economy which the CBN governor warned
was heading towards recession, Emefiele stated lamented that “headline
inflation spiked in April 2016, far above the upper limit of the policy
reference band. Inflation has continued to be driven mainly by supply
side factors such as fuel scarcity, increase in tariff and deterioration
in electricity supply, increase in the price of petrol, higher input
costs as a result of scarcity of foreign exchange, persistent security
challenges and exchange rate pass-through to domestic prices of import.”
The Committee in July 2015, had hinted on the possibility of the
economy falling into recession unless appropriate complementary measures
were taken by the monetary and fiscal authorities. Unfortunately
Emefiele raised the alarm that “the delayed passage of the 2016 budget
constrained the much desired fiscal stimulus, thus edging the economy
towards contractionary output.”
As a stop-gap measure, the Central Bank he said has continued to
deploy all the instruments within its control in the hope of keeping the
economy afloat. “The actions,however, proved insufficient to
fully avert the impending economic contraction. With some
of the conditions that led to the contraction in
Q1, 2016 still largely unresolved, the weak outlook for growth which
was signaled in July 2015 could extend to Q2”.
To this effect, current policy actions he said “have to be predicated on a less optimistic outlook for the economy in the short term, given that, even after the delayed budgetary passage in May 2016, the initial monetary injection approved by the Federal Government may not impact the economy soon, as the processes involved in MDAs finalizing procurement contracts before the disbursement of funds may further delay the much needed financial stimulus to restart growth.”
While the MPC believed that the recent deregulation of the downstream sector of the petroleum sector was in the right direction and would lead to increased supply, members of the committee noted that “the pass-through effect of prices to other products has to be factored in policy considerations. Mindful of the limitations of monetary policy in influencing structural imbalances in the economy, the Committee stressed the need for policy coordination with the fiscal authorities in order to effectively address the identified pressure points.”
To this effect, current policy actions he said “have to be predicated on a less optimistic outlook for the economy in the short term, given that, even after the delayed budgetary passage in May 2016, the initial monetary injection approved by the Federal Government may not impact the economy soon, as the processes involved in MDAs finalizing procurement contracts before the disbursement of funds may further delay the much needed financial stimulus to restart growth.”
While the MPC believed that the recent deregulation of the downstream sector of the petroleum sector was in the right direction and would lead to increased supply, members of the committee noted that “the pass-through effect of prices to other products has to be factored in policy considerations. Mindful of the limitations of monetary policy in influencing structural imbalances in the economy, the Committee stressed the need for policy coordination with the fiscal authorities in order to effectively address the identified pressure points.”
The Committee noted that the CBN had implemented accommodative
monetary policy from July 2015, with the hope of achieving growth, up
until March 2016, when the MPC switched into a tightening mode. However,
while the underlying conditions necessitating tight monetary policy
remained largely in place, sundry administrative measures implemented by
the CBN and recent macroeconomic conditions on the back of the 2016
Budget are expected to significantly dictate a key policy preference in
the dilemma now faced by monetary policy – stagflation.
Given the current limited policy space, Emefiele said it has become “imperative to balance stability with growth stance while working on options that in the short term, are certain to isolate seasonal and transient factors fuelling the current price spiral.”
Given the current limited policy space, Emefiele said it has become “imperative to balance stability with growth stance while working on options that in the short term, are certain to isolate seasonal and transient factors fuelling the current price spiral.”
Other decisions reached at the end of the meeting include to
retain the Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) at 12.per cent; Retain the Cash
Reserve Ration (CRR) at 25 percent; retain the Liquidity Ratio at 30per
cent; and retain the Asymmetric Window at +200 and -500 basis
points around the MPR.
Post a Comment