•Wike
About 254 aggrieved teachers, whose salaries had not been paid since
February 2016, filed a case against the Rivers State Governor, Nyesom
Wike, at the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) sitting in
Yenagoa,mBayelsa State.
The angry workers are teachers in primary and demonstration schools
of the Rivers State University of Science and Technology (RSUST),
Ignatius Ajuru University of Education (IAUE), and Ken Saro-Wiwa
Polytechnic (KSWP), Bori.
The teachers comprising 102 of RSUST, 97 of IAUE and 55 of KSWP are
praying the court to compel the government to pay their salaries.
The governor reportedly announced in February 2016 that his
administration would no longer pay the salaries of primary and secondary
schools’ teachers in the affected institutions where pupils and
students pay school fees.
Following Wike’s order in February, the teachers said their relevant institutions had refused to pay their salaries.
It was gathered that while the
demonstration schools at KSWP were shut down following Wike’s directive,
those of RSUST and IAUE were operating without school fees paid to the
teachers.
The claimants (unpaid teachers) sued Wike for ordering the stoppage
of their salaries praying the court to declare their appointments valid
and subsisting.
Also joined in the suit were the Attorney-General of Rivers State
(2nd defendant) and their various institutions – RSUST, IAUE and KSWP
(3rd defendant).
In the reliefs sought by the claimants against the defendants,
jointly and severally, they prayed the industrial court to declare that
their respective employments were valid and subsisting.
They also appealed to the court to declare that they were entitled to
the payments of their respective salaries, allowances and emoluments
until they attain their respective ages of retirement in their various
institutions.
They further sought a declaration that the 1st defendant’s directive
stopping the payment of their salaries with effect from end of February
2016 was unlawful, null and void.
They also sought a declaration that the 1st defendant (Wike) had no
right to order the discontinuance of the payment of their salaries with
effect from February 2016.
The claimants asked the court to direct the defendants to pay them
forthwith the arears of their respective salaries for the months of
February, March, April and subsequently to continue to pay them their
respective monthly salaries, allowances and other emoluments they were
entitled to as and when due until they attain their retirement ages.
They prayed for an order of injunction restraining the defendants,
whether by themselves or through their agents, privies and proxies from
terminating, sacking, disengaging or in any way interfering with their
employments.
When the matter came up for mention at the court, the lawyer for the
claimants, Mr. Damian Okoro, said he had served necessary papers on the
defendants since February 16, 2016.
He, however, wondered why the defendants had not deemed it fit to file their processes.
While urging the court for short adjournment, Okoro argued that the
claimants were faced with severe difficulties following the stoppage of
their salaries in February.
But the Principal State lawyer, Okogbule Gbassam, representing the
defendants, said he would file the necessary court processes before the
next adjourned date.
The court, which ruled that the matter was brought for mention and
that the parties had yet to join issues, adjourned the case until July 12 for hearing.
Post a Comment