Federal Government to establish silo in Ado-Ekiti
•Map of Ekiti State
My trepidation arose from
the fact that there is, already, an abandoned 100,000 metric Tonnes
Silo in Ado-Ekiti, owned by the same federal government evidence of
which is shown below in a public lecture I gave as far back as Thursday
19thSeptember 2013.
For the week, we are privileged to
have, as part writer, Chief Samuel Bandele Falegan, a onetime Director
of Research at the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, as well as the first
Nigerian Managing Director of the Federal Mortgage Bank Nigeria. A
trained economist, and committed patriot, Chief Falegan is the Atoye of
Ado-Ekiti.
I read with a great deal of trepidation and surprise, a newspaper report that, in its determination to promote and encourage agriculture, the federal government plans to establish a grains’ silo in Ado-Ekiti. My trepidation arose from the fact that there is, already, an abandoned 100,000 metric Tonnes Silo in Ado-Ekiti, owned by the same federal government evidence of which is shown below in a public lecture I gave as far back as Thursday 19thSeptember 2013.
I read with a great deal of trepidation and surprise, a newspaper report that, in its determination to promote and encourage agriculture, the federal government plans to establish a grains’ silo in Ado-Ekiti. My trepidation arose from the fact that there is, already, an abandoned 100,000 metric Tonnes Silo in Ado-Ekiti, owned by the same federal government evidence of which is shown below in a public lecture I gave as far back as Thursday 19thSeptember 2013.
“INTEGRITY IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE AND ITS
IMPACT ON PRODUCTIVITY”- Being THE 2013 ANNUAL PUBLIC LECTURE OF THE
EKITI STATE CHAPTER OF THE FORUM OF HEADS OF FEDERAL ESTABLISHMENTS.
There is a 100,000 metric Tonnes Silo
estimated to cost N4 billion, started five years ago in Ado-Ekiti but,
up till now, has not been completed. Much as Ekiti, an agrarian state,
needs a grain storage silo, the uncompleted or “abandoned” silos raises
doubts about the sincerity of those who conceived it if, five years
after the construction began, it is yet to be completed. Could it be
that the N4 billion voted for it has been exhausted? In a recent
interview with the contractors, apart from being doggy on pertinent
questions, all I got was a mere promise to complete it as soon as money
is made available. The questions which arise, therefore are these:
which one should come first, availability of, and potential surplus
grains, for which there will be a need for a silo or should the
provision of a silo precede availability of grains? Meanwhile, five
yearly harvest seasons have passed without evidence of surplus grains in
the state. That obviously raises the question of credibility and the
sincerity of the promoters (may be, as Nigerians have come to see since
President Muhammadu Buhari’s coming, those in charge have already
taken their “bite,” leaving the project to its fate).
I chose the 100,000 metric “Tonnes
project as an example of the waste and graft that dominated the past
governments. I am convinced that the portion below quoted from that
lecture is relevant to the illustration and the example I used. That is
also why one cannot but feel concerned about the obvious indifference
to work which, in turn, results in lack of productivity leading to lack
of vision, initiative or innovation.
Ordinarily your work here, as officials
of the federal government, ought to positively contribute to the growth
and development of Ekiti. Let me pause and explain those two esoteric
terms and explain the difference between them which, when not properly
interrogated, are in conflict with each other. Economic growth is often
measured in terms of a Nation, using such indices as Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) or Gross National Product (GNP) or National Income (NI).
It is, however, possible for a nation like Nigeria to have Economic
Growth without Economic Development especially when its components, at
the state level are understated and grassroots/ rural development, job
creation and poverty eradication are under-reported and need to be
captured in computing the national data. The consequence in economic
terms is that some indices such as population that are exaggerated or
inflated in some states in the country, (as confirmed both by INEC and
the Country’s Population Census Board) will lead to conflicting per
capita income which can more than distort the nation’s growth rate.
Nigeria, measured largely by its one crop-product of crude oil which
contributes over 80 per-cent of its revenue, is reported to have been
having positive and upward bound Economic growth of about 7 per-cent
annually since about 2004 up to 2012, when it declined to 6.19% in the
first half of 2013. Yet when other indices like rural development,
health, employment generation, road-network, education etc all of which
are indices of Human Capital Development are absent, it may turn out to
be negative such that these items being religiously pursued at the state
level but not computed in the national data, will result in growth
without development, understate its per capita income and overstate its
debt profile as recently published by the Debt Management Office. Thus,
growth cannot be real but artificial as measured by the traditional
method if, and where, there is no development as measured by Human
Development Index. Whereas positive development will be enhanced when
growth is accomplished by the latter, it is in this context that we have
to measure your assignment and mission to this state. May be you don’t
appreciate the fact that your mission to this state is meant to create
jobs and employment opportunities, leading to improved quality of life
as well as improved living standards through honest execution of the
projects directed at the rural population. Not only did I send a copy of
my lecture to the then Governor of Ekiti State, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, who
in his characteristic and patriotic concern about public waste, reacted
positively.
I hope the Federal Ministry of
Agriculture should be interested in knowing exactly what happened to the
project to which a highly regarded patriot has brought to the public
space through this article.
PDP Senators Withdraw Support From The Buhari Administration
Senators elected on the platform of the
Peoples Democratic Party, PDP announced, this past week, their
withdrawal from supporting the Buhari administration over what they
described as the government’s “belligerent attitude” towards its
members. They will do that, they said, until the APC government ends its
belligerent attitude towards PDP members. So what is this belligerent
attitude, asking thieves to return their loot? Could this be their
reaction to Buhari’s refusal to align with his predecessor’s ‘stealing
is not corruption’ mantra? Could it be that asking them to come and
justify how they believe that fraudulently forging their extant Rules to
gift Saraki the senate presidency is no internal affairs of the senate
as they claim? They even talk about coercion and intimidation as if
these words have new meanings. Pray, how does asking these two adults to
come and have their day in court equate to intimidation and how does
answering to one’s actions transmute to a case against the senate as an
institution? And, as if they are just waking up from a prolonged
slumber, they are not even ashamed to deploy the very serious economic
and security challenges confronting the country, as part of the building
blocks for their so-called withdrawal of support for the government?
When did they become ceased of these challenges? How does their
irresponsible quest for life pension and immunity for their leadership
fit into these challenges or which of their humongous allowances, which
make them rank as the highest paid legislators anywhere in the world,
have they given up? And by the way, was padding the budget and throwing
the list of ambassadors on the President’s face acts of support for the
Buhari administration? Who has not seen that both legislative houses now
barely form a quorum at plenary since Buhari made money for bills
impossible? If these PDP senators know what is good for them, their
withdrawal of support for the Buhari government should have kicked off
with Ike Ekweremadu quitting office as Deputy Senate President. Without a
doubt, these senators sure don’t know what Nigerians think of this 8th
Assembly. Rather than bellyache, I think they should be happy to have
one additional court to troop to in solidarity with their compromised
leaders. Nigerians cannot wait to see that charade.
Post a Comment