Forgery case against Saraki, Ekweremadu, a coup –Senate
Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu
The Senate on Sunday described the forgery case initiated by the office
of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice,
Abubakar Malami, against principal officers of the Senate as a coup
against the legislature.
It claimed the move was aimed at subjecting the National Assembly to the control of the executive.
The upper chamber also accused the
executive arm and some unnamed party leaders of instituting the case to
ensure that Senate President Bukola Saraki and his deputy, Ike
Ekweremadu, were remanded in prison and prevented from presiding over
the affairs of the Senate.
The Senate, in a statement by the
Chairman, Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Senator Sabi
Abdullahi, described the forgery case as unconstitutional and a
violation of the principles of separation of powers, checks and
balances.
It, however, warned that the prosecution
of the principal officers, which it alleged was aimed at forcing a
leadership change in the chamber, was capable of plunging the country
into anarchy and constitutional crisis, urging President Muhammadu
Buhari to caution Malami.
The AGF office had commenced a forgery
and conspiracy case against Saraki, Ekweremadu, the immediate past Clerk
of the National Assembly, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa, and the Clerk of the
Senate, Mr. Ben Efeturi, at an Abuja Federal High Court.
But the Senate, on Sunday, said, “We are
compelled to alert the good people of Nigeria and the international
community, that our democracy is in danger and that the attempt by the
executive arm of the Federal Government to muzzle the legislature and
criminalise legislative processes in order to cause leadership change in
the National Assembly is a return to the era of impunity and lack of
respect for due process, which we all fought to abolish.
“We urge President Muhammadu Buhari to please caution his Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami.
“It is clear that the Attorney General
and party leaders behind this action either lack the understanding of
the underlining principles of constitutional democracy, the concept of
separation of powers, checks and balances and parliamentary convention
or they just simply do not care if the present democracy in the country
survives or collapses in their blinded determination to get Saraki and
Ekweremadu by all means necessary, including abuse of office and sacking
the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”
The Senate believed other national
pressing issues should engage the attention of all levels of government
at this critical time, saying the executive should come up with bills to
tackle the nation’s challenges.
The statement added, “We are in a state
of economic emergency such that what the National Assembly needs at this
time are executive bills and proposals aimed at resolving the crises of
unemployment, currency depreciation, inflation, crime and insecurity.
“What the National Assembly needs now
are executive bills to build and strengthen institutions to earn
revenues, fight corruption and eliminate waste. Instead, we are getting
hostile actions aimed at destabilising the National Assembly,
distracting senators from their oversight functions and ensuring good
and accountable governance.
“We must make it clear here to the
individuals in the executive arm and party leadership behind these plot
not to mistake the maturity and hand of cooperation being extended to
the Presidency by the legislature as a sign of weakness.
“The National Assembly bent backwards to
accommodate various infractions and inefficiencies in pursuit of
inter-arms cooperation and national interest. We did not follow up the
various infractions because we believe there are bigger issues which the
government has to attend to in order to ensure that every Nigerian has
food on his table and live comfortably in a secure environment.”
The upper chamber of the National
Assembly said the forgery case was a strategy to send Saraki and
Ekweremadu to prison and prevent them from performing their
constitutional roles.
It stated, “This latest plot is directed
at forcing a change of leadership in the Senate or, in the extreme
case, ground the red chamber of the National Assembly. Or how do one
interpret a move in which the two presiding officers are being set up to
be remanded in Kuje Prison or incapacitated from sitting at plenary
through a day-to-day trial on a matter that is purely an internal affair
of the Senate.
“This obviously is a dangerous case of
violation of the independence of the legislature, undue and unnecessary
interference in the internal affairs of the Senate and blatant abuse of
the judicial process.
“To now take a matter that was resolved
on the floor of the Senate to the police and then make it form the
subject of a criminal prosecution of freely elected legislators beats
all imagination of free thinking men all over the world.
“The implication is that any matter that
fails on the floor of the National Assembly will now be taken to the
Police, thereby endangering every senator and House member.
“This current move clearly runs contrary
to the doctrine of separation of powers and checks and balances, which
are fundamental to the successful operation of the presidential system
of government. It runs counter to the principle outlined by the Supreme
Court in Adesanya Vs Senate case, where it was held that nobody should
seek to use the courts to achieve what he or she has failed to push
through on the floor of the National Assembly.
“This present effort, therefore, is
clearly a coup against the legislature with the ignoble aim to undermine
its independence and subject the law making institution to the whims
and caprices of the executive. It is a plan to return Nigeria to the
dictatorial era which we have, as a nation, voted to reject.
“It is a dangerous trend with grave
implications for the survival of our democracy and the integrity of the
component institutions.
“This rule of men as against the rule of
law is also the reason why the war against corruption, one of the
cardinal objectives of the present administration, is losing credibility
because people perceive it to be selective and, in most cases, aimed at
settling political or partisan scores.”
It added that the Rules of the Senate and how the institution elected its leadership were internal affairs.
It said, “The Rules of a new Senate are
provided by the National Assembly bureaucracy. It has always been so
since 1999. After the inauguration of the Senate, if Senators have
objections to any part of the Rules, they can follow the procedure for
changing it.
“Senators of the Eighth Senate have no
control on the rules applied in the elections of June 9, 2015, because
until after their inauguration, they were only senators-elect and
therefore mere bystanders in the affairs of the Senate.”
The Senate urged Nigerians and the
international community to condemn what it called “this blatant attempt
to subject the legislature to the control, whims and caprices of the
executive.”
The red chamber added, “If the
legislative branch falls, democracy fails as there will be no other
institution empowered by the constitution to check and balance the
enormous powers of the executive branch.”
Meanwhile, Ekweremadu said on Sunday
that he had not received any court papers from the Federal High Court
over an alleged suit preferred against him and others concerning the
forgery of the Senate Standing Order in June, 2015.
A national daily, had reported that Ekweremadu would appear in court on Monday (today).
But the deputy Senate president, who
spoke with our correspondent through his Special Adviser, Media and
Publicity, Uche Anichukwu, in Abuja, said he was reading and hearing
about his invitation by the police and the suit like every Nigerian.
He said, “Even as we try to reconcile
the reports of the simultaneous police invitation and court processes,
nobody has, till date, served the Deputy President of the Senate any
letter of invitation by the police or court summons.”
Also in another statement on Sunday,
Ekweremadu challenged the Federal Government to meet him in the law
court over the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Order 2015 instead
of convicting him in the court of public opinion.
He expressed surprise that the same
police, which said in July, 2015, that they did not invite him for
questioning over the production of the Senate Standing Order 2015, now
claimed that the man and others shunned the invitation extended to them
since July, 2015.
The statement said, “This latest attempt
to try and convict him in the court of public opinion notwithstanding,
we do not want to mount a public defence. We would rather meet them in
court if they so wish.
“If an attempt on his life on November
17, 2015 (which there are no facts or information to show that the
police investigated an incident of such magnitude duly reported to them)
did not deter him, certainly not even a purported police invitation,
lawsuit, propaganda and intimidation would cow him.’’
Post a Comment