Reps, Fashola trade words over N35b Housing budget implementation
Fashola
House of Representatives Committee on Housing Tuesday accused
Babatunde Fashola – led Ministry of Power, Works and Housing of
incompetence over the implementation of the 2016 N35b budget for the
Housing component of the Ministry.
This is as Fashola expressed concern over poor response from States
for provision of land for the National Housing project with 17 out of 36
States responding to the request so far.
Chairman of the Committee, Mustapha Bala (APC, Kano) during an
interactive session with the Ministry on the status of the
implementation of the budget doubted the competence the Ministry to
implement the National Housing project, six months into the fiscal year
2016.
The Committee became agitated when the Minister, Babatunde Fashola in
his presentation said the Ministry was still in the process of sorting
out the designs for the project.
Fashola, who said he inherited a 2012 Housing plan that had no
blueprint on how to implement it, disclosed that the public private
partnership (PPP) agreements entered into by previous administrations
could not solve the country’s housing challenges.
With a target of 21,008 units, the previous PPPs could only deliver 2750 units over the years.
He regretted that most of the PPPs that claimed to have delivered
their targets had no evidence to show for it, while the delivered houses
were inaccessible and out of the reach of most Nigerians.
In view of the failure of the previous PPPs, he said the Ministry had
to look at a sustainable and affordable housing project for Nigerians.
Besides going into partnership with a German firm for the provision
of energy efficient housing units to be incorporated into the National
Housing code, the Minister disclosed that the Ministry has commissioned
Shelter Afrique for a $5,000 housing unit for low income earners.
He said the Ministry is looking at either mortgage financing or
rent-to-own option as modes of payment for the prospective house owners.
According to the Minister, the Ministry was yet to advertise for the
project because it has just was in the pruned down the unit designs from
480 to 12 but had to further reduce it to six.
He also disclosed that letter have been written to States for
provision of suitable land in the capitals and Local governments
headquarters for the project but only 17 have so far given commitments
from the 19 that responded.
He said the Ministry can only commence with just four States that have completed the process from 17 that have given their commitment.
He said the Ministry can only commence with just four States that have completed the process from 17 that have given their commitment.
He said the Ministry will not provide single design nationwide but
different House types that include one, two and three bedroom bungalows
and duplexes taking into consideration the peculiarities, culture and
environment of each State.
The Committee Chairman was not however impressed by the Minister’s
presentation saying it appears the Ministry is incompetent to implement
the budget.
He said: “What has the Ministry been doing since November last year
when the budget was presented till now that appropriate designs are not
ready, you have not even advertised for it?
“Are you not competent or what, because you ought to have competed
the design by February so that once the budget was passed you commence.
Design should not take more than 15 days because your experts in the
Ministry have been doing it for years.
“By the time you start this project, you will have just about three
months left in the year, even if the budget is extended to March 2017
that will be just six months”.
The Committee also wondered why the Ministry could not dispense with
redundant and non-performing PPPs while wondering if there was a
framework and criteria for qualification.
Fashola, in his response said the blame for the late implementation of the budget should not be heaped on the Ministry
He said: “That is a strange question because a bulk sum was proposed
in the budget for the National Housing project and we asked States in
need to access it willingly but the House insisted that it must go
round.
“The result is what we are seeing now; many did not respond because
housing needs of each State differs, taking into cognizance the role
migratory factor plays here”.
He also said the Ministry should be commended rather than criticized
for the work it has done on the project, adding, “The Ministry should be
commended and not condemned because the budget is inadequate.
“As a result of that, we are focusing on sustainable housing plan
that works rather than rushing the budget, affordability and slum
prevention is key to this design.
“Other countries that had housing program decades ago did not even
have 100 percent home owners but they have a near uniformity of designs.
By the time we go full circle, we won’t be talking of N35b but hundreds
of billions
“Why it took so long for the design to be ready,
infrastructures-roads, sewage disposal, water and others have to be
planned into the housing and that’s what the Ministry is doing.
“To say all these should be done in three months is difficult because
we need a plan that will accommodate cultures and other peculiarities
of each State. Our designs are based on feedback.
“I appeal to the Honourable House that we look at the larger picture,
even if you are not impressed with my staff, I have a different
opinion.”
Post a Comment