N1.3bn Dasukigate: Omisore not yet entitled to bail, says court
A High Court of the Federal Capital
Territory in Maitama, Abuja, on Friday dismissed the bail application
filed by a former govenorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party
in the 2014 election in Osun State, Iyiola Omisore.
Omisore, also a former Deputy Governor
of Osun State, was arrested on July 3 and has since been detained in the
custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission over alleged
criminal investigation in relation to about N1.3bn of the Office of the
National Security Adviser’s fund traced to him.
The money was said to have been released to him in 2014 by the immediate past NSA, Sambo Dasuki, without any justification.
Justice Olukayode Adeniyi in a ruling on
Friday held that Omisore’s bail application was incompetent because it
was filed during the period when an order for his remand obtained by the
EFCC from another judge of the High Court of the FCT, Justice J.O
Okeke, on July 8, was still valid.
While the order to remand him for 14 days was made on July 8, Omisore filed the bail application on July 11.
Justice Adeniyi held that the only
option open to Omisore was to await the expiration of the remand order
to renew his application for bail.
The judge held that by virtue of the
provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, while
the order made by Justice Okeke was still subsisting, the same court or
any other court of coordinate jurisdiction could not grant the suspect
bail, except a court sitting as an appellate jurisdiction.
He also noted that Omisore’s lawyer,
Goddie Uche (SAN), failed to show with “any legal submission” that the
court had the power to grant bail to the suspect while the court’s order
for his remand was still subsisting.
The judge ruled, “In the present case,
the remand order was issued on July 8, 2016. It is not in dispute that
this instant application was filed on the same date on July 8, 2016 and
up till date; the said remand order has yet to fully run its course.
“Therefore, by my understanding of the
provisions of ACJA, the only time the court is competent to consider
whether or not to exercise its discretion to grant bail to a suspect in
the same situation with the applicant in the present case is, either
pursuant to section 295 of the ACJA at the point the application for
remand is made, or in the case when a suspect is still in custody or
remand at the expiration of the order of remand pursuant to section
296(1) and (2) of the Act.”
He noted that had the attention of
Justice Okeke who granted the order remanding Omisore on July 8 been
drawn to the fact that the EFCC had on its own, earlier granted an
administrative bail to the suspect, perhaps the judge would have
considered the propriety of proceeding with the anti-graft commission’s
application.
He said Justice Okeke might have on the other hand, exercised his discretion in granting bail to Omisore.
The judge added, “Nevertheless, the
court having in its wisdom, and competently so, ordered the remand of
the applicant in the first respondent’s (EFCC’s) custody for 14 days
which order is still subsisting, any attempt to grant the instant
application will be tantamount, in my firm view, to vacating the remand
order.
“I do not suppose that the ACJA
envisages or contemplates the situation wherein, a court other than a
court exercising appellate jurisdiction, having made an order of remand
under sections 294 and 296 thereof, should proceed within the lifespan
of the same order to make such other order upon the application of the
suspect which has the effect of countermanding the remand order.
“The applicant’s learned counsel has
failed to show what power this court has and I am not aware of any to
make an order in the nature as prayed in the instant application which
has the tendency and implication of upturning a subsisting order of my
learned brother, Okeke J.
“I must therefore agree with the
submissions of the first defendant’s counsel that in the present
situation, that the court having made an order for the remand of the
applicant for a period of 14 days, cannot turn around to make another
order countermanding the same order for remand for the release of the
applicant on bail.
“In other words, the issue of bail to
the suspect cannot arise before the same court that has validly made an
order for his remand during the lifespan of the order.
“In my view, the cause open to the
applicant is to await the expiration of the order made on July 8, 2016
and thereafter exercise his rights under section 296(3) of the ACJA to
renew his application for bail.
“In totality, and without any further ado, my decision is that the instant application is premature in the circumstance.
“It is hereby incompetent and inappropriate.
“Even though, I have not considered it on merit, the application must and is hereby dismissed.”
In its counter-affidavit opposing the
bail application, the anti-graft commission stated that the former Osun
State senator was still being investigated for alleged offences
including, retention of proceeds of crime, among others.
Meanwhile, an EFCC’s investigator,
Kassim Yusuf, who deposed to the counter-affidavit, stated that Omisore
had no justification for the money he received from the ONSA.
Yusuf stated, “Investigation so far
carried out, reveals that the applicant received hundreds of millions of
naira from the office of the National Security Adviser, with nothing to
show for it.
“In the course of interviewing the
applicant, he has mentioned names of persons and companies through which
monies from the office of the National Security Adviser got to him.
“There is need for those persons and companies mentioned by the applicant to make some clarification.
“If the applicant is granted bail, he
will interfere with witnesses and he will also prejudice and frustrate
our on-going investigation.”
Yusuf stated that Omisore received the
funds through the account of Firmex Gilt Ltd’s bank account domiciled in
United Bank for Africa Plc.
The suspect was said to be the sole signatory to the account.
He was also said to have received
several payments through account of Sylvan Menamara Ltd with Diamond
Bank Plc. The investigator also stated that his agency had as evidence
of Omisore’s involvement in the suspicious transaction e-payment
schedules, statements of the account and signatory mandate card.
Post a Comment