Nigeria without oil: Has Buhari put the right foot forward?
The dwindling oil revenue was already taking a toll on
the economy when President Muhammadu Buhari assumed office last May 29.
Buhari’s first mission was how to salvage the economy. Experts believe
he has taken the remarkable steps towads preparing Nigeria for life
without oil. They ask that diversification be pursued with vigour.
Assistant Editor EMEKA UGWUANYI reports.
DESPITE raking in $1 trillion from oil production in the past 57
years, Nigeria has little to show for the huge earnings. Reason: its
leaders have not been able to provide basic infrastructure for the
citizeny. Neither have they been able to raise power output beyond 4,500
megawatts (mw) for the estimated 170 million population. To worsen
matters, unemployment has reached unprecedented level and the population
of the poor continues to soar. For more than four decades, successive
administrations failed to look beyond oil – the nation’s major revenue
earner.
Since he mounted the saddle last May 29, President Muhammadu Buhari
has not hidden his plan to diversify the economy. To him the bazaar in
the oil and gas sub-sector is over. His administration, he pledged, will
enact policies to diversify the economy to agriculture, manufacturing
and mining, among others.
The President blamed abandonment of other sectors and the
over-dependence of past administrations on oil as the country’s
problems. He has demonstrated his commitment be relying on non-oil
sectors to fund the N6.08 trillion budget.
Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Export
Promotion Council (NEPC) Segun Awolowo confirmed the diversification
programme in a presentation to African Development Bank (AfDB) officials
on development of the non-oil export in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire. Awolowo
said NEPC has designed a ‘Zero Oil Plan’ to achieve the feat.
The initiative, according him, is NEPC’s strategic alignment with the
administration to grow the non-oil sector and non-oil export.
He said the “revolutionary” plan in export promotion would answer
the questions on what would Nigeria sell? Who would be the buyers? How
much will it earn? Like most oil exporting economies, Nigeria has been
hard-hit by the tumbling prices of oil at the international market.
Falling from over $100 per barrel in the third quarter of 2014, the
Nigerian grade Brent Crude crashed to $27 a barrel in the first quarter
of this year. The result: a sharp fall in government revenue.
The reduction in revenue allocation to the three tiers of government
has led to the irregular payment of salaries by many states. So, the
President may be laying the foundation for economic diversification,
infrastructure investment and social spending, with the implantation of
the 2016 Appropriation Act.
The programme, Awolowo said, will boost domestic production capacity
and mitigate the impact of oil price shocks in future. He said the
President told a delegation of manufacturers last year that “Nigeria
must begin to behave as if we have no more oil.”
He went on: “For years Nigeria has imported thousands of goods worth
over $50 billion a year, which we pay for mainly with crude oil proceeds
of over $70 billion each year. Our fears have now materialised, in the
past two years, crude oil prices have fallen by 60 per cent and
Nigeria’s earnings have likewise fallen by at least $35 billion,
inevitably leaving a financial hole in the economy.
“The pressing question now is how to fill this funding gap. And the
answer is simple: Nigeria must find new things (not oil) to export
quickly, in large commercial scale. If Nigeria broadens and grows its
export basket, a positive chain reaction ricochets throughout the
economy.
“The logic follows – when you grow exports, national output
(agriculture, industry, solid minerals) will also grow; local businesses
will grow; supporting infrastructure will expand; and jobs and
investments will definitely follow. The overall macro impacts will
result in growing foreign reserves (from export forex) and a more
resilient economy.
“We are not the only nation in history to have ever faced this
challenge. When India, the second largest country in the world, faced
similar hardships under its founding father, Jawaharlal Nehru, his
clarion call was simple: ‘India must export or perish’”.
“Nehru’s mantra changed the thrust of his country’s economic policy,
and today, India exports over $300 billion of non-oil goods yearly. More
importantly, India made sure that no single product, not even oil (if
it has it) would hold the people to ransom. Other countries have
similarly done well in exports. For instance, Brazil does over $200
billion of non-oil exports and Malaysia over $250 billion. Despite our
population of 170 million people and being the seventh most populous
country in the world, we make only $5 billion in non-oil exports.
“The questions to ask are: What happened to our proud history in palm
oil, cocoa, groundnuts and cotton? We were the toast of the world.
Where are these products now? Only three of the top 20 exporters in the
world depend heavily on oil exports, and today, even those three are
fast diversifying.”
According to Awolowo, Brazil rakes in $17 billion from soybeans;
Saudi Arabia, $30 billion from petrochemicals and Bangladesh, $5 billion
from T-shirts.
He said in 1980, China and Nigeria each accounted for one per cent of
global world exports. “So, in a sense then, we were equals.”
However, by 2011, China accounted for 11 per cent of global exports
(all non-oil), while Nigeria was less than 0.4 per cent. Like the
Chinese, the only way to strengthen the naira is through increased
productivity and capacity as well as focus on export.
The NEPC chief said the proposed zero oil plan targets a long-term
goal of earning over $100 billion from non-oil exports (20 per cent of
today’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). When compared to ratios of other
emerging markets, this is reasonable.
According to him, China’s is 24 per cent, Brazil, 12 per cent; South
Africa, 31 per cent and Malaysia, 76 per cent. Nigeria’s long-term goal
is to grow non-oil exports from S$5 billion today, to $18 billion by
2019, and $30 billion in non-oil exports by 2025.
“The zero oil plan identifies 21 priority countries as markets for
local products and 11 strategic export products with high financial
value to replace oil including petrochemicals, palm oil, cocoa,
soybeans, rubber, to name a few,” he said.
Why Nigeria should
look beyond oil
At the 10th anniversary of Bell Oil and Gas Limited in 2012, former
Group Managing Director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation
(NNPC) Funso Kupolokun said Nigeria earned over $800 billion from oil in
the last 50 years with little to show for it.
Nigeria’s earnings from oil export in 2011, according to the Energy
Information Administration (EIA), the statistical arm of the United
States’ Department of Energy, reached a peak of $99 billion, well above
$70 billion in 2010. The EIA also noted that the nation’s oil export
revenues for 2012 and 2013 were $94 billion and $84 billion and $77
billion in 2014. It identified Nigeria as the fourth highest earner in
oil exports in 2014 in the 12-member Organisation of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC), coming after Saudi Arabia that earned $246 billion,
Iraq ($87 billion) and Kuwait ($81 billion).
At the Wole Soyinka Centre’s Annual Media Lecture in Kaduna last
year, Governor Nasir El-Rufai stated the need for the country to look
beyond oil. His reason: some of the nation’s traditional customers
including the United States (U.S.) have become self-sufficient following
the discovery and exploitation of shale oil and gas, while others have
developed alternatives thus reducing their reliance on Nigeria’s ‘light,
sweet crude oil.’
According to El-Ruffai, Nigeria has another chance to anchor its oil sector reform agenda on projected realities.
“And we must do that in the knowledge that the world is not waiting
for us, that while we dallied new suppliers have come into the global
oil business and buyers have more choice. Nigeria has to look at
developing and earning substantial incomes from other sectors of the
economy outside the energy sector”, he added.
With developments in the oil industry, Nigeria cannot continue to
rely on oil revenue. Technology has made oil-consuming countries to
become net oil exporters. Nigeria’s major crude oil importer, the U.S.,
has with hydraulic fracking technology been able to extract oil and gas
from shale, reducing its demand for conventional oil and gas.
This has made the U.S.self-sufficient in crude oil, making it to
import less than one per cent of Nigeria’s crude, Nigerian Liquefied
Natural Gas (NLNG) Limited Managing Director Babs Omotowa, said.
China, which ranks as the biggest importer of Nigeria’s crude, has
huge deposits of shale oil and gas. By the time it begins exploitation
of the resource, it will dump Nigeria’s oil.
Besides, with advanced technology, oil has been found in many countries in Africa, and competition for market share is intense.
Iran, a major oil producer is also back with the lifting of sanctions
on it. South Africa is also considering the development of its shale
reserves.
Oil sector analysts have foreclosed the rise of oil price to the $100 per barrel anytime soon.
Even, the world’s largest oil producers are diversifying their
economies. For instance, Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil producer
with an output of over 11 million barrels per day, has begun to focus on
petrochemical products to earn revenue.
Besides the shrinking market and revenue, internal security issues
such as the Boko Haram insurgency in Northeast and militancy, pipeline
vandalism and oil theft in the Niger Delta (all of which have
significantly reduced oil production and proceeds), as well as
widespread corruption in the public sector, are additional reasons for
the government to diversify the economy.
A fallout of the falling oil revenue is seen in government’s
inability to meet its funding obligations in the oil and gas joint
venture projects it operates with some local and international oil
companies.
The refineries are dysfunctional and past administrations failed to
utilise oil windfalls when prices averaged at $100 and $145 per barrel.
Other oil producing countries invested part of proceeds from their oil
boom periods in other sectors and also saved in their Sovereign Wealth
Funds (SWFs), according to Managing Director of Seplat Petroleum
Development Company Mr. Austin Avuru.
According to him, Norway has a GDP of $512 billion and SWF of $893
billion; Qatar with GDP of $203 billion has SWF of $256 billion and
Saudi Arabia with GDP of $748 billion has SWF of $762 billion. These
countries, he said, withstood the low oil price regime because of their
impressive GDP and SWF, but Nigeria had SWF of $500 million, which The Nation learnt has just grown above $1 billion.
Achieving sustainable
diversification
To oil and gas industry operators, the industry is only a catalyst
for the development of other sectors. Because of the volatility of oil
prices, producer-countries always channel proceeds from oil at periods
of high price to other sectors while saving for when things won’t be
rosy. With this planning, they can withstand price slump and invest
during low oil price regime to reap the dividends when price goes up
again.
The operators noted them, the oil and gas industry has never been a
huge employer anywhere in the world, adding that but when the
hydrocarbon is processed in-country, it adds value. Hence, oil producing
countries have refineries and petrochemical plants.
To the Group Chief Executive of, Oildata Group Mr. Emeka Ene, Nigeria should review its dependence on oil.
He said: “Looking beyond oil as a country, we need to look at cluster
development. What happens is that people are striking in different
directions uncoordinated. Manufacturing, agriculture and trade
constitute over 60 per cent of our GDP.
“We can leverage expertise in the oil industry to be able to push
through regional development, with industrial parks, free trade zones
that are emerging across the country in a coordinated manner, such that
we decide that all our wellheads are produced in-country.
“How do we do that? Companies that will make up that will come from
these different industrial parks in the country; they will form a supply
chain that will deliver value within the next one to two years.
“It makes sense that now that we go beyond oil but it must be
coordinated. It is not just let everybody go back to the farm. That will
not put food on the table. A lot of investments need to be made in a
coordinated effort and the oil industry can help lead that effort.
“Even within the oil industry, secondary processing is important. The
Niger Delta energy corridor is a concept that has been talked about and
is being promoted. It is a way to transform the Niger Delta into a
secondary processing zone where oil is not simply extracted and
evacuated from the country but it goes through levels of processing. It
will capture over 40 per cent of oil value locally.
“We don’t have enough people who can provide the number of jobs this
will create because it will eliminate or crash the unemployment rate
as the raw materials are processed locally. But if all we do is to
extract oil, send it offshore, we will continue to have the same cycle
perpetuating itself for the next 20-50 years.”
Petroleum Association of Nigeria (PETAN) Chairman Bank
Anthony-Okoroafor, said oil lays the golden egg for other sector’s
development. He, however, noted that earning from oil is just about
$15-20 billion a year, and the other sectors have about $500 billion.
He said: “So, the local content policy should be spread across
sectors – oil and non-oil. That is the only way the country will gain,
and ensure this generation and future generations will have employment.
That is the only sure way to create substantial local entrepreneurs.
“When PETAN advocates local content, we don’t only talk about oil and
gas but also other sectors of the economy, which have potential
earnings in excess of $450 billion. For instance, with agriculture,
insurance and other sectors, we have so much to benefit as a country if
we work together to ensure we empower proven Nigerian entrepreneurs and
companies.”
Why diversification
should be supported
Drumming support for Buhari’s commitment to move the economy away
from oil, the Dean of Schools at the Educational Advancement Centre
(EAC), Gbenga Adebambo drew an analogy between Malaysia and Nigeria
which gained independence almost the same time. He said it was
regrettable that while Malaysia has over time become a robust economy,
Nigeria has consistently struggled to rid itself of corruption and the
consequences of a mono-economy. Nigeria, he noted, emerged in the first
decade of its independence as a leading exporter of many major
agricultural commodities.
Adebambo said: “Agriculture was the pride of the nation as it became
the leading exporter of palm kernel, and the largest producer and
exporter of palm oil. Nigeria also dominated the world also as the
second largest producer of cocoa in the world. Nigeria has lost its
place among agricultural exporters.
“It is poignant that the groundnut pyramids in the North has become a
myth to the present generation; but the basic truth is that the
situation is still redeemable if we go back to the drawing board to
redesign and diversify the economy towards maximising the potential in
agriculture and other sectors.”
He noted that after many years of war, corruption and abject poverty,
the Malaysian government embarked upon a critical redesigning to reduce
the Asian country’s dependence on commodity exports (mainly rubber and
tin), which put the country at the mercy of fluctuating prices as oil
does Nigeria.
The Malaysian government was also aware that demand for natural
rubber was bound to fall as the production and use of synthetic rubber
expanded. The government was able to see beyond the proceeds from rubber
and developed alternative sources of employment.
Today, Malaysia’s capital city, Kuala Lumpur, hosts the tallest
building in Southeast Asia (Petronas Twin Towers). It has become one of
the most industrialised cities and fastest-growing metropolitan region
in Southeast Asia, serving as a tourist attraction and foreign exchange
earner for the country.
Post a Comment